I don't know, I think it's dangerously simple, as in it appeals more to
people in it's simplicity, than in it's truth. It'd be nice to think
'letting go' results in the world taking care of itself, but I don't
think that's true. It's more true that much of the goodness in the world
comes because of the hard work of people behind the scenes, that gives
the impression of 'the world taking care of itself'. A better philosophy
would be: Politicians, leaders and the general populace should butt-out
of things they know nothing about; no single-entity can control
everything with good results, but don't think that the world isn't or shouldn't be controlled.
↧
Re: The Tao of Libertarianism
↧